Ciente > Articles by: Ciente Editorial Team

Making ABM Simple for Fintech Startups With AI and Predictive Analytics

Author: Ciente Editorial Team

Making ABM Simple for Fintech Startups With AI and Predictive Analytics
Blogs

Making ABM Simple for Fintech Startups With AI and Predictive Analytics

Making ABM Simple for Fintech Startups With AI and Predictive Analytics

ABM fails when it’s reactive. You must dive into which accounts matter now and why. Here’s how AI and predictive analytics can help a fintech startup like you do precisely that. And scale faster.

FinTech moves fast enough to scald anyone who hesitates. Markets turn overnight. Demand surges and collapses without warning. Competitors appear from nowhere.

Funding dries up. Buyers disappear halfway through the funnel. Forecasting stops feeling strategic and starts feeling like gambling.

Most FinTech startups try to survive this chaos by copying what the bigger players do. They invest in content volume, automation systems, and demand capture tactics that once worked in predictable markets.

But none of it works anymore.

Growth becomes accidental instead of engineered. Revenue becomes unstable. And ABM collapses into a cluster of disconnected activities instead of a strategy.

The Case of ABM in the Fintech Industry

Most ABM programs in FinTech look good in a slide deck and fall apart in execution.

Where precisely do they go wrong?

  1. They chase accounts based on logo value.
  2. They target industries based on assumptions.
  3. They create campaigns without knowing where urgency lives.
  4. They obsess over job titles instead of motivation.
  5. They operate like detectives arriving after a crime scene.

Timing is always late. Momentum is already gone. And by the time a lead fills a form or downloads something, someone else has already shaped their thinking.

ABM becomes a performance rather than a weapon. Here’s a secret for you.

AI and predictive analytics can rewrite this script.

They expose early signals long before a buyer takes an obvious action. And reveal interest before the world sees it. They identify the shift within accounts when something is about to break open.

Luck and guesswork are replaced with foresight. This transforms ABM from a reactive marketing strategy into a proactive positioning. Your team goes from offense to defense.

Why ABM Needs Predictive Intelligence

Traditional ABM tracks surface activity. It all about vanity metrics- email clicks, website visits, event attendance, and content downloads.

But what marketers forget is that these signals show up too late in the customer journey. They arrive after the decision-forming work is already underway.

Teams see these signals and assume they create opportunity. They don’t. They confirm it.

And this is precisely why most pipelines are built too late.

Because by this time, most deals die. Most forecasting fails. And insights arrive after decisions are already made.

It’s where predictive analytics can remove the hitch.

Predictive analytics studies hundreds of hidden signals that reveal intent much earlier. It can be anything from hiring movements, budget restructuring patterns, or new compliance pressures, to technical restructuring or competitor content consumption.

These signals tell the story before the story forms. They indicate change. And this change drives the pipeline.

ABM without timing is noise. ABM with timing is your ultimate leverage.

Why FinTech Startups Need Predictive ABM for Growth

Startups do not win by spending more. They win by seeing sooner. They do not have a budget advantage. They have a focus advantage.

Precision is their only weapon.

They cannot target 10,000 accounts. They must target the 100 that matter now.

AI gives them that clarity. It removes personal bias. It kills guesswork.

It ranks accounts based on real movement instead of opinion. It exposes which accounts are heating up. It reveals the actual decision-maker within the buying committee. It identifies which message breaks resistance. And it guides when to attack for maximum velocity.

This advantage changes everything.

Sales stops chasing ghosts. They stop begging for conversations. They stop overrelying on cold messaging. They walk into rooms where buyers already feel understood.

Deals accelerate because of internal urgency that aligns with your timing.

Predictive ABM does not create a pipeline. It reveals it.

Case Study: How AI Rewired ABM for FinTech Companies

1. Ramp

Look at Ramp.

They used predictive analytics to identify companies that illustrated sudden interest in expense control before they posted public cost-cutting announcements. And outreach hit before competitors noticed anything.

The result?

Close rates jumped because they caught decisions that were still forming, not ones that were already made.

2. Brex

Brex analyzed funding activity patterns and learned that pipeline success correlated heavily with hiring rate volatility.

When companies hired fast, they bought aggressively. And when hiring froze, they bought risk tools instead. Messaging shifted based on prediction, not assumption.

ABM became timing intelligence, not persona fiction.

3. Chime

Chime built its acquisition model by studying behavior outside its owned channels.

It analyzed social signals during periods of economic stress. They noticed spikes in conversations around overdraft pain. Messaging shifted overnight.

This shift pushed them ahead of banks, spending millions more.

4. Stripe

Stripe never competed through ads.

It used predictive signals around developer community momentum. They reached people before their companies formalized their payment strategy. They shaped the belief that payments should be simple. This came before anyone had the chance to complain about complexities.

None of these examples is accidental. They all hinge on seeing what others miss.

How Predictive ABM Actually Changed the Game

Teams stop wasting time on accounts that look impressive but are unready.

They stop debating targeting based on political influence. They stop burning budget on content no one needed. They stop fixating on channel playbooks. So, what did these brands do correctly?

They build everything around proof rather than a feeling.

The company becomes the one that arrives early. The brand learns to speak directly to the internal conversation already happening.

Buyers stop feeling sold to. They feel understood.

And deals stop being forced. They start flowing smoothly through the pipeline.

A Tactical ABM Framework With AI and Predictive Analytics

This is how a FinTech startup transforms ABM into a growth engine:

  1. Identify the right-fit accounts: Pull predictive signals from intent platforms, CRM patterns, competitor movement, funding triggers, hiring data, and category velocity. Rank accounts based on readiness, not industry.
  2. Map pressure points: Study changes happening within each account. Know why urgency exists. Know what fear or opportunity drives action.
  3. Build messaging from pressure rather than personas: Speak to the internal conflict, not the job description. Speak to the motivation, not demographics.
  4. Time outreach based on signal spikes: The right message at the wrong time is noise. Timing creates momentum.
  5. Watch signal acceleration, not signal volume: Accounts that move quickly convert faster. Speed reveals intent strength.
  6. Measure conversation quality, not clicks: Conversion starts when a buyer drops their guard. The metric is honesty, not vanity.
  7. Align ABM with sales in real time: If sales learns something from a call, it becomes a data signal. If marketing sees a signal trend, it becomes a sales script. No walls.

Real World Example of the Framework

Imagine a startup selling fraud prevention solutions sees intent signals spike for three accounts after a series of high-profile fintech fraud news cycles.

Funding data shows one of the accounts just raised a round. Predictive scoring places them above everyone else. Then? Outreach launches within 24 hours, not three weeks later.

The seller enters the conversation with insight about the internal trigger, not a cold introduction. They say what the buyer is already thinking but has not voiced yet.

The deal is fast-tracked because the vendor understood timing and tension. That is predictive ABM.

And that’s how a pipeline is engineered.

ABM’s Future in FinTech is All About Creative Intelligence.

ABM used to be built on creativity.

Now it will be built on intelligence. Creativity will still matter, but timing and context will dominate.

The companies that win will not be the ones who shout the loudest. They will be the ones who see the earliest. They will break into conversations before they become public. They will build belief before the prospect realizes they need it.

AI will not replace humans. It will replace the guesswork.

And predictive analytics will not automate ABM. It will turn it into a competitive weapon.

This is the shift: from pursuit to anticipation.

Startups that learn this scale. The ones who do not die in their dashboards, wondering why nothing converts.

ABM breaks when it reacts. It wins when it predicts.

AI and predictive analytics give FinTech startups the only currency that matters now: foresight. Precision will replace volume. Timing replaces brute force. Influence replaces promotion.

The bottom line? Revenue becomes intentional, not accidental.

FinTech startups do not need bigger budgets or louder campaigns. They require intelligence. They need to say fewer things but with more truth. They need to act before the market wakes up, i.e., stay ahead of the curve.

If you want growth, stop chasing demand. Start recognizing it.

Thought Leadership for Fintech
Blogs

Thought Leadership for Fintech: Elevate Your Organic Reach by Creating Impact, Not Noise

Thought Leadership for Fintech: Elevate Your Organic Reach by Creating Impact, Not Noise

Most finance companies mistake noise for progress. Thought leadership must pivot, and so much fintech- to show impact, not volume.

Thought leadership has become an empty phrase in finance. Everyone claims the title. Few earn it. The result is a marketplace full of noise disguised as reports and whitepapers.

The content holds little value. It’s nothing new.

A sea of LinkedIn posts repeating the same lines. People scroll past it all without thinking. But it’s not because they hate content. They hate knowing precisely what it says even before reading a single line.

The real problem is simple-

Most companies write content to sound intelligent. They do not write to say anything real, of unique value. They hide behind industry language. And pad ideas with technical jargon to avoid taking any risks.

Their goal is straightforward: Approval instead of impact.

And then they wonder why organic reach collapses.

You cannot influence people without confronting them. Trust holds no weight without vulnerability. Tension can’t be avoided. Companies must face it and find the appropriate tactic to navigate through it.

That’s thought leadership for you.

Thought leadership for fintech begins where most brands stop.

It starts with saying the thing everyone knows but refuses to say out loud. Any attempt at reach is an illusion without this spine. Visibility without meaning is invisible. You can publish every day. You can flood channels. You can even optimize keywords.

But none of it matters if your ideas fall flat.

Reasons Fintech Companies Can’t Garner Organic Reach

Algorithms are cruel. But that isn’t what kills organic reach.

It’s all about the lack of consequence. The majority of financial content describes the world rather than changing how people actually perceive it.

It lists trends. It summarizes news. It recycles predictions. It tells customers what they already know and calls it insight. There is nothing to add. No new opinions to share. And nothing to argue.

People do not share content because it exists.

They share it because it moves them. Because it reframes something they believed, giving them language for something they felt but could not articulate. Because it exposes something latent.

Your content should hit a nerve, irrespective of the industry you’re in.

And that’s precisely what actual thought leadership does. By lifting the pressure valve. That’s what makes the audience carry it forward- share it across their own audiences. Because it hits a nerve.

Impactful thought leadership does this. It lifts the pressure valve. And when it does, people share it.

You cannot force organic reach. It’s earned over time. No amount of frequency and formatting can push your content toward the audience. Reach isn’t the reward for producing more volume of content.

It’s about relevance. Honesty and opinions that reflect the truth. A perspective that inches away from the generic slop on the Internet.

Thought Leadership in Finance: Examples

The financial industry is a cautionary tale.

Every process rewards risk avoidance. Every approval chain waters ideas down. Every word passes through legal sterilization. The culture trains people to stay safe. But safe ideas die fast.

The companies that changed the market never played it safe:

  1. Stripe did not improve payments. They attacked complexity.
  2. Robinhood did not advertise trading access. They attacked financial elitism.
  3. Klarna did not talk about installments. They reframed buying behavior.
  4. Revolut did not market features. They marketed rebellion.

None of them waited for their audience’s permission. It’s because they weren’t chasing validation. They didn’t keep churning out content that blended in. So, what did they do differently?

They said something that split the room. That is why the room listened.

Your Biggest Challenge: Most Financial Thought Leadership Sounds the Same

The human brain remembers two things: novelty and emotional consequence. Everything else vanishes.

So, what happens when the industry recycles one storyline and similar glossy phrases?

Transformation. Innovation. Acceleration. AI. Customer experience. Modernization. Future of finance. Digital trust. Risk intelligence.

These ideas are not wrong. They are merely empty. They are floating concepts without conflict or point of view. There is no tension, contrast, stakes, or anything that demands perspective.

Buyers have nothing to feel. So they remember nothing.

What Thought Leadership for Fintech Should Actually Mean

Thought leadership isn’t intelligence. It’s not expertise or polished content. It’s not a content calendar. And it’s definitely not volume. It’s not even the number of channels you publish on.

This begs the question: what truly is thought leadership?

Impactful thought leadership is the courage to add a distinct perspective. It’s the decision to stand for something that might cost you something. But most of it stems from your own expertise and industry knowledge.

It’s just that a fraction of business leaders and brands are scared to apply it. To avoid taking risks and play it safe in a market where reputation can topple overnight. That’s what fintech companies are doing incorrectly.

Most fintech brands refuse to take a position. (Or are afraid to)

They want to please everyone. And by trying to speak to everyone (all segments), they ultimately reach no one. For example, the use of flattened language to avoid taking a stance. They apologize through their tone. They drown ideas in disclaimers.

Real leadership content provokes. It invites conflict. It sharpens the edges rather than sanding them down.

If your ideas cannot offend, they will not lead. If everyone agrees with you, you are repeating, not leading or disrupting the market (that’s much-needed).

And if your message doesn’t create friction, forget about reach.

Stir emotions.

Emotions at the Base of Financial Thought Leadership

Finance loves data. Because numbers equal certainty. Proof equals trust. And authority stems from explanation and a deep dive into logic.

Yet real decisions are human. They are emotional. And shaped by a plethora of external stimuli- fear, identity, hope, ego, risk tolerance, reputation, pride, insecurity, and self-preservation.

A CFO does not choose a platform because a chart proves ROI.

They opt for it because not choosing looks irresponsible. Because the team needs a short-term win. Or, when the market shifts under their feet, they cannot afford silence. Or because a competitor forces urgency. Or because they want to be respected.

Or it’s all of the above.

Emotion decides. Data justifies. But thought leadership cannot be so clean. And cut corners.

Thought leadership fails when it ignores this truth.

What Needs To Change for Thought Leadership in Finance?

Thought leadership needs to shift from performance to perception.

  1. Information to interpretation
  2. Describing trends to challenging them
  3. Explaining to questioning
  4. Checking boxes to creating tension
  5. Trying to look credible to saying something true.

The work is not creating more content. Forget about the days when volume worked wonders. The era of Mad Men marketing is long gone.

Thought leadership content is building a point of view. One strong enough to survive the 3Cs- confusion, complexities, and conflict. A viewpoint that stirs something up.

Thought Leadership to Improve Organic Reach: The How-To for Fintech

Real influence happens when a company becomes the origin point of a conversation. It should reframe reality by naming what their competitors avoid.

Exposing what is broken. And highlighting what no one talks about.

Because organic reach doesn’t ask you to speak louder.

It’s built by speaking sharply. Precision wins attention. Specificity builds trust. Clarity can move markets. A perspective that cuts through assumptions spreads without effort.

And your reach grows when the audience sees themselves in the content. That’s why relevance is always pinpointed as the treasure trove of any marketing message. It voices experiences that can’t be defined.

And brands feel human.

From manufactured experiences to lived experiences. That’s what thought leadership in finance should target. But finance content rarely feels human. It feels engineered. It feels risk-managed.

People listen when you talk about the pains. When you confront the dominant narrative. It makes your voice real.

Thought leadership becomes organic reach when:

  1. The audience feels spoken for, not spoken at
  2. The ideas shift perspective
  3. The content carries emotional weight
  4. Someone feels different after reading it

The Bottom Line? Own the Narrative.

The strongest companies don’t compete inside the narrative.

They rewrite it. They define the language the industry leverages. They become market-driving and not market-driven. The content you write must shape the problem before it sells the solution.

The market aligns once a company owns the narrative. But it’s because they are right, not that they are loudest in the room.

You build a system rather than developing content this way.

Thought leadership is a market campaign. It’s a system.

Campaigns end. Systems compound. They turn belief into identity. They transform customers into advocates. They turn followers into contributors. They create gravity.

Influence is not built in posts but in memory.

People wait for what comes next when a brand consistently speaks the truth. Not out of curiosity. But out of trust.

Thought Leadership for Fintech: The Winning Move

The brands that win will not be the ones with the most content. The days of creating for the sake of approval have shifted drastically. Metrics and algorithms always carried significance. Because brand consistency has been attributed value since the olden days.

But thought leadership must reiterate. And so must the fintech companies of today.

Structure is a requirement, but not the differentiator. All it does is add to the noise. Not your overall progress. You must reject this recycled thinking. Polish is great. But leaning too much into it erases depth.

That’s when your thought leadership will start making a difference.

When the point of view is clear. You say the uncomfortable thing. And speak like humans.

The truth is that people are tired of corporate personality. They want a pulse.

Thought leadership is not a marketing strategy. It is a responsibility. It demands sharp thinking. It demands honesty. And a position. The financial sector cannot buy trust. It must earn it by telling the truth before it is too late.

Organic reach follows brands that stand up, not brands that stand back.

If you want to reach, stop trying to impress. Start trying to matter.

NVIDIA
News

NVIDIA-Synopsys Partnership All Set to Revolutionize Workflow Complexity

NVIDIA-Synopsys Partnership All Set to Revolutionize Workflow Complexity

NVIDIA to help Synopsys streamline the physical and digital realities with next-gen digital twins. A strategic step to unlocking newer opportunities in design and engineering.

The market has become all about speed and efficiency. And that’s why tech adoption surged across all industries. The purpose was one- to accelerate the operations.

But it wasn’t easy to integrate the legacy systems with the emerging tech. After all, the tech stack faced a huge flexibility gap. Most traditional systems and their codes are barely decipherable. It’s all about their integration potential. It’s complicated and, honestly, lengthy.

These changes and innovations took away some obstacles. But in many cases, it also added complexities. Specifically, across industrial workflows where teams didn’t know how the new, shiny piece of tech would integrate into their functions.

For example, it’s almost impossible to assume the in-demand simulation speed and scalability in engineering through traditional CPU computing. It added to existing workflow complexities, elevated development costs, and time-to-market.

Such hindrances halt the market expansion. Limiting the opportunities, especially for R&D teams.

And it’s precisely what NVIDIA’s partnership with Synopsys hopes to transform.

To achieve something unattainable.

One side of this alliance is all about Synopsys’ innovative, state-of-the-art engineering solutions. The goal? Help design, simulate, and verify their latest products at half the cost and with better performance.

What NVIDIA offers is AI and computing capabilities. It’s the cherry on top.

From every atom to chip, every nitty-gritty will be taken care of. Such that the ultimate system drives never-before-seen scale and speed to building functional digital twins within computers. That will convert traditional systems into intelligent ones- ones that combine the prowess of electronics and physics.

It’s a new dawn for design and engineering domains.

This partnership isn’t to build a solution. Or solve a much persistent problem.

Synopsys, with NVIDIA, hopes to build an empowering ecosystem. One that fuels engineers with the right tools to help shape our future in the right direction.

Beyond the Lead Score: How to Measure 'Dark Social' Impact in Regulated Markets
Blogs

Beyond the Lead Score: How to Measure ‘Dark Social’ Impact in Regulated Markets

Beyond the Lead Score: How to Measure ‘Dark Social’ Impact in Regulated Markets

Let’s be honest. Your attribution dashboard is lying to you.

You log into HubSpot, Salesforce, or Marketo, and you see the charts. The line goes up and to the right. The biggest bar on the chart probably says “Direct Traffic” or maybe “Organic Search.” You smile. You put it in a slide deck. You tell the board that your SEO strategy is killing it or that your brand awareness is at an all-time high. But deep down, you know something is wrong.

You know that a CFO of a Tier-1 bank didn’t just wake up on a Tuesday, type your exact URL into the browser, and request a demo for a six-figure implementation. That is not how human beings behave. And it is certainly not how risk-averse financial institutions buy software.

They heard about you somewhere else. Maybe in a private Slack community for finance leaders, maybe at a closed-door dinner in London, or maybe from a peer who whispered that your solution helped them dodge a compliance audit. This is Dark Social. It is the invisible current that moves the buying journey.

In our last piece, we established that you need to penetrate these hidden circles. But now comes the question that makes every marketer sweat during a budget review: “If we can’t see it, how do we measure it?”

Especially in regulated markets like fintech. We have a unique problem. We can’t just pixel everything. We can’t track every movement. Compliance, GDPR, and strict privacy laws act as handcuffs. So, do we just throw our hands up and guess? No. We get smarter. We stop obsessing over precision and start looking for the truth.

The Fallacy of the Lead Score

The obsession with the “Lead Score” is a relic of a different time. It is a comfort blanket for marketing teams that want to prove they are busy. In the traditional playbook, it looks like this:

  • User downloads a whitepaper: +10 points.
  • User opens an email: +5 points.
  • User visits the pricing page: +20 points.
  • Boom. MQL. Send it to sales.

But in fintech, a high lead score often means nothing. In fact, it might be a negative signal. A junior analyst doing market research can rack up a score of 100 in an hour. They are downloading every PDF you have because their boss told them to “map the landscape.” Does that mean they can sign a contract? No. They have zero purchasing power.

Meanwhile, the decision-maker – the VP of Engineering or the Head of Risk – might never visit your site until the day they are ready to sign. They are learning about you through backchannels, screenshots shared in private groups, and offline conversations. Your scoring model is measuring activity, not intent. And in a regulated market where trust is the only currency that matters, activity is a vanity metric. We need to measure influence. And influence is messy.

Why “Regulated” Makes This Harder (and Simpler)

In e-commerce or low-stakes SaaS, you can rely on cookies and cross-site tracking. You can follow the user around the internet. In fintech, your buyers are behind firewalls that would make the Pentagon jealous. Bank employees often block third-party cookies by default. Their internal networks scrub tracking parameters. They don’t click ads because their compliance training told them that ads are vectors for malware.

This means your “Direct Traffic” bucket is artificially inflated. Every time a banker types your name because they can’t click a tracked link, it shows up as Direct. This is actually a good thing. It forces you to abandon the illusion of control. Since you cannot track the mechanical path, you must track the psychological path.

Tactical Solution 1: The “Self-Reported” Attribution

This is the single most high-leverage change you can make today. It will cost you zero dollars, but it requires political capital to implement because it messes up your clean data. Add a required field to your demo request form: “How did you hear about us?”

The Rules of the Field:

  1. It must be required.
  2. It must be an open text field.
  3. No drop-down menus.

If you give them a drop-down with options like “Google,” “LinkedIn,” or “Event,” they will pick the first option just to get through the form. It’s human nature. But if you let them type, they will tell you the truth. And the truth is specific.

They won’t say “Google.” They will say: “Saw a discussion about you on the FinOps Slack channel.” “My ex-colleague at Revolut recommended you.” “Heard you on the ‘Fintech Insider’ podcast.”

How to Analyze This Data: You cannot automate this into a dashboard immediately. You need a human to read it. Group these responses into buckets:

  • Demand Creation: Sources where they found you passively (Podcasts, Peers, Communities, Social Posts).
  • Demand Capture: Sources where they found you actively (Google Search, Review Sites).

If 80% of your responses are “Google,” you have a demand creation problem. Nobody knows you exist until they search for a category. If 50% of your responses are “Peer Recommendation” or “Community,” your Dark Social strategy is winning. You can take those text snippets to the CFO and say, “This is the ROI of the community work we do.”

Tactical Solution 2: Split the Search Metrics

If your Dark Social strategy is working, people should be looking for you by name, not by category. Most SEO reports are obsessed with generic keywords like “best payment gateway” or “embedded finance platform.” These are important, yes. But they measure the market, not your brand.

To measure Dark Social, you need to isolate High-Intent Organic Brand Traffic. Look at your search console. Filter for queries that include your brand name combined with high-intent modifiers:

  • “[Brand Name] vs [Competitor]”
  • “[Brand Name] pricing”
  • “[Brand Name] security compliance”
  • “[Brand Name] reviews”

If you run a campaign targeting the “connections of connections” in a specific niche (as we discussed in the previous post), and three weeks later these specific search terms spike – that is not a coincidence. That is causation. In regulated markets, this is your safest proxy. You aren’t tracking the individual; you are tracking the aggregate market behavior. Did the market get louder about us after we started engaging in these communities? If yes, keep going.

Tactical Solution 3: The “Sales Loop” Verification

We mentioned this before, but let’s go deeper. Your sales team is not just there to close deals; they are your primary research unit. But salespeople are busy. They won’t fill out a complex survey for marketing. You need to train them to ask one specific question during the first 5 minutes of the discovery call.

The Script: “I saw you came through our website, but I’m curious—what specific conversation or event triggered you to look for a solution right now?”

Notice the difference. You aren’t asking “How did you find us?” (They already answered that on the form). You are asking about the Trigger Event.

The answer to this question reveals the hidden journey that data misses. The prospect might say: “Well, we were discussing vendor risk in our internal audit committee, and your name came up as the only one with SOC2 Type II compliance ready to go.”

The Insight: This tells you that your “Security First” messaging is penetrating the Buying Committee (Dark Social) before the prospect ever reaches out. Record these calls. Use tools like Gong or Chorus to transcribe them. Search for keywords like “heard,” “told me,” “colleague,” or “read.” This creates a qualitative dataset that is harder to argue with than any Google Analytics chart.

The Shift from ROI to COI

Finally, you need to change how you sell this to the board. ROI (Return on Investment) is calculated too quickly in most marketing departments. You spend $1 today, you want $2 tomorrow. In enterprise fintech, where sales cycles are 6 to 18 months, this math kills good marketing. It forces you to do short-term lead gen that annoys people instead of long-term brand building that builds trust.

Start thinking in terms of COI – Cost of Inaction. If you do not invest in Dark Social, what is the cost?

  • The cost is that you remain a commodity.
  • The cost is that when the “Buying Committee” meets in private, your name isn’t on the lips of the CFO.
  • The cost is that you are only invited to the RFP as “column fodder” to compare against the market leader.

You are hoping they find you on Google. Your competitor is making sure they are already famous before the search bar is even touched.

Conclusion: Comfort vs. Truth

Measuring Dark Social in a regulated environment isn’t about finding a better tool. It’s about having the guts to present a different kind of report. It requires you to stand up and say: “The numbers in the dashboard are correct, but they aren’t the whole truth.”

The truth is in the text fields. It’s in the sales conversations. It’s in the reputation you are building in rooms you cannot see. Don’t let the lack of a perfect metric stop you from executing the right strategy. Because while your competitors are busy staring at their lead scores and celebrating vanity metrics, you will be busy winning the market.

Selling Security to the Skeptic: A Marketer’s Guide to Winning Over the Fintech CTO
Blogs

Selling Security to the Skeptic: A Marketer’s Guide to Winning Over the Fintech CTO

Selling Security to the Skeptic: A Marketer’s Guide to Winning Over the Fintech CTO

The Fintech CTO does not hate marketing. They hate the risk that marketing promises but doesn’t deliver on. To win them over, you have to stop selling a dream and start proving you are not a nightmare.

You walk into the meeting room. Or more likely, you join the Zoom call. And there they are. Arms crossed. Camera slightly angled up. Looking at you with the distinct expression of someone who has just audited a thousand lines of spaghetti code.

The Fintech CTO.

To the average marketer, they are the final boss. The “Department of No.” But to a strategist, they are the only person in the room who actually matters.

Why? Because in fintech, where money and data flow in a high-stakes digital stream, the CTO is not just protecting the stack. They are protecting the very existence of the company. And here you are, pitching “seamless integration” and “AI-powered growth.”

To them, you sound like a security breach waiting to happen. You sound like “slop”.

The disconnect is not technical. It is philosophical. Marketing runs on the promise of what could be. Engineering runs on the mitigation of what could go wrong. It is entropy versus order. And if you want to sell security to a skeptic, you have to stop speaking in possibilities and start speaking in probabilities.

The Landscape of Distrust: What businesses need to know about the CTO

We have to understand the environment before we can change it. The scope of this problem is complex.

Lead generation today has become a continuous cyberattack. This has happened unknowingly and slowly. But think about it from the CTO’s perspective. Their inbox, their LinkedIn, and their social feeds are bombarded with bad actors, malicious intent, and the exploitation of data.

This is the “spam spectrum”. It ranges from clickbait to exploitative to malicious. And because the barrier to entry for using AI and automation tools has lowered, the volume of this noise has increased. It is a negative loop.

The industry spammed Google’s search with repetitive blogs and used grey-hat techniques. Now, AI is exacerbating the problem.

So when you approach a Fintech CTO, you are not starting from zero. You are starting from a deficit. You are guilty until proven innocent. They assume you are part of the “copycat” culture—the party that survives in Game Theory by mimicking others but ultimately fails to build trust.

They believe your services and products do not entice them because you are only after their money. And frankly, in many cases, they are right.

The Supply Chain of Anxiety

Let’s reframe the situation. You are not selling software. You are asking to be part of their digital supply chain.

There is a concept that every Fintech CTO knows intimately. The Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) and the risks associated with third-party vendors.

We saw this clearly when hackers targeted the npm package. It disrupted the supply chain and affected millions of users. This is how organizations get their data stolen. A weak supply chain does not just disrupt users. It erodes the trust they have in the organization.

If a CTO integrates your solution, they are introducing a new node into their carefully constructed network. If that node fails, they are the ones who have to answer for it.

For a CTO, trust is not a warm, fuzzy feeling. It is a mathematical certainty that your code will not implode their infrastructure on a Friday night. When you pitch “speed to market,” they hear “untested vulnerabilities”. When you pitch “AI automation,” they hear “hallucinations and data leaks”.

They are keenly aware that bad actors are everywhere. In Game Theory, people who do good and people who cheat both fail. The copycat survives. The CTO assumes everyone is a potential copycat or bad actor until proven otherwise. Including you.

The Pigeonhole Problem

There is another layer to this skepticism. It is not just about security. It is about exhaustion.

We call this “The Pigeonhole Problem”.

Leaders are good at doing their job, which is managing people and solving problems. This causes decision-fatigue to build up. There is a reason why they feel hung out to dry. Their nervous system is actually tired from all the mental hard work they do.

Their vision narrows down. They have to manage stakeholders and user expectations. And now you are adding to that load?

When you come in with a complex pitch or a “revolutionary paradigm,” you are not offering a solution. You are offering more entropy. You are adding to the “analysis paralysis” that 86% of tech decision-makers already feel.

Your job is not to add to the cognitive load but to alleviate it. You must prove stability. You must show them that you understand their specific context.

Data is molecularly contextual. A security solution for a neobank is radically different from one for a legacy insurer. If you pitch a generic solution, you are telling them you do not understand their problems.

A Guide to Winning the Skeptic

So how do we bridge this gap? How do we move from being a “vendor” to being a “partner”? It requires a fundamental shift in how we communicate. It requires us to abandon the traditional “sales playbook” which reduces prospects to past-based predictions.

Here is the blueprint.

1. Kill the Buzzwords and Speak in Precision

The first step is to drop the marketing noise.

If you start talking about “synergy” or “disruption,” you have already lost. Why? Because these words obscure meaning. And in security, obscurity is dangerous.

The CTO values precision. They live in a world of hard constraints.

Instead of saying, “We have bank-grade security,” say, “Here is our SOC 2 Type II report. Here is exactly how we handle encryption at rest and in transit.”

Be explicit. As we know, clarity reduces the “whiplash effect” that technology creates. Do not hide behind a dashboard or a glossy PDF. Show them the architecture.

If you cannot identify a meaningful difference in your product, you have a product problem, not a lead gen problem. Fix that first.

2. Address the “Hidden” Committee

You are rarely just selling to the CTO. You are selling to a committee. And in fintech, the internal politics are intense.

You might entice the CEO or the CFO, but they make up only a fraction of the buying committee. The CTO has identified that integrating you into the stack could be problematic.

They are questioning your security features, transfer protocols, and whether you increase the surface area for cyberattacks.

If you are not answering these questions before the first touchpoint, you are too late.

This is where Account-Based Marketing (ABM) becomes a tool for intelligence, not just targeting. You cannot know the internal politics unless you send a spy inside the organization. But since that is illegal, you use ABM to treat accounts’ differing viewpoints as leverage.

You need to understand the “dark social” aspect. Where do these CTOs hang out? Who are they talking to? What are their peers saying about you?

3. Trust as Currency (and Leverage)

We have discussed how trust is the basis of all AI and marketing use. But in the context of selling to a CTO, trust is a finite resource.

Every time you make a claim you cannot back up technically, you spend that currency. Once it is gone, it is gone.

So how do you build it? By acknowledging failure.

This sounds counterintuitive to a salesperson trained to handle objections by burying them. But try this. “Here is where our product might break. And here is the fail-safe we built to ensure it does not take you down with it.”

Suddenly, you are not a vendor trying to make a quick buck. You are a partner who understands that in a disordered universe, perfection is a fallacy.

You treat the buyer as a relational node instead of a transactional one. You show them that you are not playing the short-term game of the “cheater” or the “copycat.” You are playing the long game of the “cooperator.”

4. The Privacy-First Approach

In an age where marketing is perceived as invasive, a privacy-first approach is the antithesis of spam.

This is especially relevant for fintech. The CTO is responsible for the privacy of their users’ data. If your marketing tactics feel invasive, they will assume your product is invasive too.

Trust is built by making people feel in control.

Do not rely on “hacks” or “AEO” tactics to force your way into their visibility. Use pure research to understand their pain and offer solutions. Let them choose.

This creates a “myth” or an identity for your brand. If your myth is “Trust,” then every interaction must reinforce that.

5. Audit the Supply Chain Before They Do

Before you even approach the CTO, you need to audit yourself.

You need to anticipate the SBOM of your potential leads. You need to get a third-party risk management audit done before your buyer has the chance to ask for it.

If you send a file and their legal team flags a vendor in your supply chain, you have lost momentum. Every moment spent is money out of your pocket.

Founders and CEOs often delegate this to marketing, but it falls on everyone’s shoulders. You cannot market a product that has a “leaking” supply chain.

The perspective in fintech no one considers

We often forget that behind the “CTO” title is a person.

They have wants, ideals, dreams, fears, and hopes. Afraid of the tech outpacing them. And of making a decision that will cost them their reputation or their company’s solvency.

The frustration is shared. They don’t live in an ivory tower or think they’re better than you (well no promises here).

When you approach them with empathy, not as a target to be acquired but as a peer to be understood, the dynamic changes.

You stop being a “marketer” in the pejorative sense. You become a “strategic management system”. You help them navigate the uncertainty.

Marketing in fintech is all about trust, convenience and mending promises

The Fintech CTO is not a skeptic because they hate you. They are a skeptic because the market is full of “leakage.” Broken promises. Weak supply chains. And vendors who prioritize revenue over reliability.

They are waiting for someone to show up who speaks the language of reality. Not the language of “marketing spam.”

They want to know that when the inevitable entropy hits, that when the servers crash or the hackers knock. You will be standing there with a shovel, ready to bury the dead. Not hiding behind a clause in your contract.

That is how you sell security.

Not with a pitch. But with the truth.

This is the only way to differentiate. If you cannot do that, no amount of lead gen is going to fix that pipeline.

The question is not how do we get them in the door. That part is easy. The question is: why should they trust you when you can fail?

Your answer to that question is your strategy. Everything else is just noise.

Customer Acquisition Cost: Avoiding a Business That Leaks
Blogs

Customer Acquisition Cost: Avoiding a Business That Leaks

Customer Acquisition Cost: Avoiding a Business That Leaks

CAC might be the metric that’s holding you back. But that isn’t the entire truth. Here’s a reframe, one that may change how you think forever.

Without revenue and profit, a business dies eventually. And behind it all is a simple concept known as the CAC or customer acquisition cost- it is either a balance or a leak that hurts profits and revenue.

Of course, solving for the CAC to be perfect is a folly of its own. There’s a reason so many tools and products cost so much: the supply chain of any given product is vast, and there are many vendors involved in the process. Whether that’s marketing or talent outsourcing or some other reason, vendors make up a vital part of a business’s process, and a bad vendor can mean the doom of an organization.

And yet marketing teams and the founders of their companies are stuck measuring CAC as: Marketing Spend/No. of Customers.

What is wrong with the industry? No wonder organizational prices are ballooning up, and backfilling becomes the norm. Of course, churn’s going to exist- this piece doesn’t serve to help you remove churn, and if someone is promising you that, you should be scrutinizing them and their process to make sure it’s the truth.

The point here is that marketing teams in B2B SaaS marketing are missing something vital.

It’s the digital supply chain and vendor relationships. You wanna know why the CAC is up this quarter when sales were smoother? It’s not the marketing budget- it’s the way the ship is being run. It’s about time the founder takes responsibility for the cost.

And if your company doesn’t have one, then to the CEO it is.

CAC: The truth every founder needs to know

Your CAC is good, and everything is running smoothly marketing-wise, but why is your revenue not matching the organizational pace? And why is the marketing spend just increasing?

See, you don’t need another shmuck telling you what to do. So this is not what to do, but the things you need to watch out for.

What you need is not advice but a different lens to look into specific problems. No one knows what it is like in your shoes, and they shouldn’t assume your vantage point. It is lonely at the top, after all.

So here’s a view from down in the hills: even if your CAC is fine, your business is leaking revenue because the way CAC is calculated is very 1-dimensional. This is simple.

CAC is how your entire organization is run to capture one customer, and it is folly to calculate it as marketing spend divided by the number of customers acquired.

No wonder people blame marketing. It’s because the industry has let this happen. Leads. Captures. Data. These are abstract concepts.

The reality is that the buyers care whether the product or service you have is solving their problems- the marketing is there to amplify the organization’s message. There are two schools of thought that are vital to this discussion: –

  1. Michael Porter posits that strategy is the act of unique execution.
  2. Marketing success is based on the unique execution of the organization.

Without this, everything crumbles. This is a recent example; we found this during research.

Disruption of the supply chain

Essentially, some hackers targeted the npm package, and it affected millions of users. This is how organizations get their data stolen.

And a weak supply chain not only disrupts your users but also erodes the trust they have in you. Once trust erodes and the word spreads, it becomes difficult to acquire customers, making marketing’s job that much harder.

But this is a breach in the software part of the digital supply chain- what happens when something else in the chain sets off? For example, you just sent off a file to your buyers and their legal team sends you a checklist of items, and there’s a redline that says: “If you have an XYZ vendor in your Supply Chain, we might have to go over the contract. They have been blacklisted for undisclosed reasons.”

And lo and behold, that vendor is in the supply chain. This is a double whammy. NPM attacks and a vendor’s mistake caused a delay in the deal. Every moment spent is money out of your pocket. And worst case? What if this doesn’t go through?

What’s going to happen to the CAC now? Many things, but it will affect trust, word of mouth, and everything else. Again, making marketing’s job that much difficult. CAC suffers; the negative loop continues.

You need to anticipate: –

  1. The SBOM of your potential leads
  2. And get the SOC 2 (While this is here, the assumption is that your product or service has this before you even got your first buyer.)
  3. Get a third-party risk management audit done before your buyer has the chance to.

Founders and CEOs, understand, yes, you have delegated marketing, but that doesn’t mean the rest doesn’t fall on your shoulders. Don’t pull out of marketing before you get to auditing your process and the way your product reaches the market.

The Role of Marketing in CAC

Now, we operate under the belief of the above section. So what is marketing’s role in improving CAC?

Let’s move away from leads- that’s the job of your trusted agency partner anyway (Hey, we’re Ciente, a trusted marketing agency!)

What you do need is to become a strategic function- a pillar that manages customers and does so profitably. And this is what marketing was supposed to do- it isn’t a content farm. The content is a vessel for communication.

What it is supposed to do is enable you to build a brand and find strategic opportunities for market penetration. Sometimes, this just so happens by hopping on a trend. Wild world we live in.

But hey, your founders are blaming you for messing things up, and the CAC is bad, and the CLV is leaking. This is just the first 3 hours of your job anyway. You know what’s going to work, so why not do it? You have the most data of all the teams combined and understand what the market wants and needs.

And once sales align with you- oh, you know the stats for it. But here’s a reframe that should help you speak to the founder.

Identifying the leaks

Your organization has leaks, you know it, and they run deeper than the organization. These leaks exist all over the market- these could be trust markers, or changes in product that are a long time coming, but aren’t because of equilibrium in the market.

But you have data. You have viewpoints. You have a strategy- that’s why you are the marketing leader. But much of your time is being wasted putting out fires and then being blamed for them.

So what do you do? Projections.

Let’s run this experiment: –

  1. You project what’s going to change based on the data from marketing and sales.
  2. You suggest these changes, which will be a controlled experiment, to your CEO or founder. It’s like multivariate testing but for the organization. Choose things that, if broken, won’t affect the organization anyway.
  3. See if the projections match reality.

Yes, this is what you already do for advertising. The job is the same, the scope varies by a margin.

Bridging the engineering gap

Remember SEO audits? Yup. That’s what you’re going to do on the supply chain. Again, this is radically complex because the idea says: –

  1. Break down the silos.
  2. See what’s not working.

But again, you have to be positioned to do this. Why does McKinsey get a say in consultancy but not the in-house team?

Back to the point, this involves you as a leader understanding differing perspectives.

  1. What are sales saying?
  2. Customer success?
  3. And vitally, the engineers.

The engineers are what’s driving the show, and sometimes it gets rough even for them. They need your help to understand the product. But isn’t this such a rosy picture? You go to the engineering team, and they are like, “Yeah, sure, we will add that feature. Were magicians with infinite time on our hands anyway?”

But what you need to do here is help them understand why the product isn’t standing out the way they hoped it would, and that requires a certain political acumen. But why are you letting that stand in the way of improving things?

The answer is: because it’s not your job.

That is changing rapidly.

Bridging the trust gap

There are many more that you can do to improve not just this metric called CAC, but the entire organizational structure. But the most important one is trust.

How is trust gained? It’s showing up when it counts. But that is too complex to quantify. And marketing, even though a very human endeavor, needs to be quantified. So trust can be quantified as whatever metric you choose- brand mentions, smoother conversations, faster deals, etc.

Though the path to reaching the metric is finding blind spots- a lot of marketing is reactionary to problems. Almost PR in a way. Something fails, and you scramble for an apology or to put the fire out.

But what if, during ABM or any other personalized campaign, you saw that some buyers don’t like a specific vendor? You can choose not to do your job with them- you can avoid risks before they arise. But this means letting go of vendors that you know are just going to give you lead lists or unverified data or low-quality work in general.

Trust is built through a process of customer understanding, repeating what they know, challenging assumptions, and showing them proof of the assumptions. Of course, some will enjoy the echo chamber, and for them, the step ends at repeating what they already know.

What do businesses need to do with the CAC? Rethink it.

This piece has one purpose: not to look down on people who run the organization and to show a different perspective.

You may not agree with some or all of it, and that’s fine. Because no one knows your position better than you do. You have the tools and the data, but is it all for targeted advertising?

That has to be a reductive view. The CMO role is shrinking, and the AI systems are getting smarter, but people will find new ways of working. The question is: will organizational structures match today’s reality or become a relic of a bygone era?