Perplexity

Perplexity Comet AI browser app is now available for iPhones: Details

Perplexity Comet AI browser app is now available for iPhones: Details

Comet is now on iOS. Perplexity’s AI browser, which debuted on desktop last summer at a price that made most people do a double-take, is now free on mobile, with optional paid tiers starting at $20 a month. It was supposed to launch on March 11.

The team pushed it back a week. It went live yesterday.

Here is what it actually is. Comet blends a traditional browser with an AI assistant that can summarize pages, answer questions, and carry out tasks on a user’s behalf. The agentic approach, where the AI does not just respond but actively navigates, clicks, and completes actions, has become the defining feature in what is now a crowded field of AI-enhanced browsers.

The practical features on iOS are worth knowing. The browser delivers standard search results for simple, high-intent mobile queries like scores, local businesses, and directions, while routing more complex questions to Perplexity’s answer engine for researched, cited responses. Deep Research, Perplexity’s multi-source synthesis tool, is fully available on the mobile version. Research threads sync across desktop and mobile, so users can start a task on their laptop and pick it up on their phone without losing context. Voice mode is in. Extensions are not, due to Apple’s platform restrictions.

The app takes full advantage of Apple’s Liquid Glass design language, and it can be set as the default browser. No iPad version yet.

A few things worth knowing before you download.

Every iOS browser is required to run on WebKit, the same engine that powers Safari. So Comet cannot compete on raw rendering performance. What it is betting on is everything that happens after the page loads. That is a legitimate product bet, and it is the right one for what Perplexity is trying to build.

Perplexity collects browsing and search history from Comet to build ad-targeting profiles. That is not buried in the terms. The company has been transparent about it. But it does reframe what free means here. A browser with access to your tabs, your emails, your shopping, your calendar, and your research threads is a fairly intimate instrument. The trade being offered is convenience in exchange for a detailed behavioral profile. That is a trade people make every day, knowingly and not. It is just worth naming clearly when the product is positioned as a thinking partner.

Perplexity is reportedly in discussions with smartphone manufacturers about pre-installing Comet on upcoming devices. If that happens, the distribution story changes considerably. A browser that ships pre-installed does not need to win you over in the App Store. It just needs to be good enough that you do not switch away.

The browser category has not seen genuine disruption since Chrome dethroned Internet Explorer fifteen years ago. What Comet, Chrome’s Gemini integration, and OpenAI’s Atlas browser are all pointing toward is that the next version of that disruption is not about speed or standards compliance. It is about what the browser does when you are not actively driving it.

That is a different kind of browser. Whether it is one people actually want is the question this launch begins to answer.

Instagram Flips the Privacy Switch on Users for Government Approval

Instagram Flips the Privacy Switch on Users for Government Approval

Instagram Flips the Privacy Switch on Users for Government Approval

Instagram is relinquishing end-to-end encryption this May. Meta is trading your privacy for a quieter life with regulators. It is a massive U-turn.

Meta is officially abandoning the “privacy” dream.

Your Instagram messages will no longer have end-to-end encryption starting this May. For years, Mark Zuckerberg told us that private communication is a fundamental right. He spent millions on ads telling us how safe our messages were.

Now, he is quietly opening the door for everyone to take a look.

The company is hiding behind the “child safety” argument. They claim that removing encryption will help them catch bad actors. While that sounds good in a press release, it is a convenient excuse to appease regulators in Europe and the US.

Governments hate “dark spaces” where they can’t see what people are saying. Meta finally got tired of the legal fights and decided to sacrifice your privacy to make their own lives easier.

It’s a total surrender.

Once that encryption is gone, your data is vulnerable to hackers, government surveillance, and Meta’s own advertising algorithms. You should assume that anything you type in an Instagram DM after May is public record.

If you actually care about your privacy, it is time to delete the app and move to Signal. Meta proved once again that its “principles” are merely marketing until they become inconvenient.

Micron Proves That AI Memory Success Comes at a Massive Price

Micron Proves That AI Memory Success Comes at a Massive Price

Micron Proves That AI Memory Success Comes at a Massive Price

Micron hit record earnings, but the stock still crashed. Why? Because the AI memory war is growing expensive, and investors are starting to panic.

Micron just proved that being the leader in AI memory is a double-edged sword.

The manufacturer’s latest earnings report was actually fantastic. They beat expectations across the board because every tech giant on earth needs their high-bandwidth memory chips.

However, the stock price plummeted immediately after this call.

And the reason is simple: greed vs. reality.

Wall Street wants the massive profits from the AI revolution, but they don’t want to pay for the factories.

Micron announced a capital expenditure plan that is absolutely eye-watering. They have to spend billions merely to keep up with the demand. Investors saw those numbers and ran for the hills. It is a classic case of short-term thinking.

You cannot dominate the semiconductor industry if you aren’t willing to build.

The market is being incredibly dramatic here. Samsung and SK Hynix are fighting for every inch of market share.

If Micron stops spending, they lose the race. They are forced to bet the entire company on the idea that the AI boom will last for decades. It is a high-stakes gamble, but playing it safe would be a death sentence.

Investors want a free lunch, but in the chip business, the bill always comes due.

DeepMind Has a New Weapon, Google Just Poached the Smartest Brain in Finance

DeepMind Has a New Weapon, Google Just Poached the Smartest Brain in Finance

DeepMind Has a New Weapon, Google Just Poached the Smartest Brain in Finance

Jasjeet Sekhon is leaving Bridgewater for Google DeepMind. This move shows Google is ready to dominate the world of AI-driven economic forecasting.

Google DeepMind just made a move that should make every hedge fund manager in New York very nervous.

Jasjeet Sekhon, the chief scientist at Bridgewater Associates, is jumping ship to join Google’s elite AI unit. This is not just another corporate hire. It is a massive statement of intent from Mountain View.

Sekhon is a legend in the world of causal inference. While most AI models are great at spotting patterns, Sekhon specializes in understanding why things happen. That distinction is the holy grail for financial modeling.

If DeepMind can integrate his expertise into their latest models, they won’t just be predicting the next word in a sentence. They will be predicting the next shift in the global economy.

The brain drain is now flowing from Wall Street back to Big Tech. For years, banks used massive salaries to lure data scientists away from Silicon Valley. Now, the allure of pure computing power and the chance to build a “world model” is proving too strong to resist.

Critics might say that one man cannot change a giant like Google. Is it?

DeepMind has always been a research powerhouse- but with its limitations. It has often struggled to turn that research into hard cash.

And by bringing in someone who has spent years at the world’s largest hedge fund, Google is signaling that the era of “AI for fun” is over. They are building AI for profit. We are watching the birth of a new kind of digital economist.

If Sekhon succeeds, Google might soon know more about the market than the Federal Reserve.

Apple

Apple has acquired MotionVFX

Apple has acquired MotionVFX

On Monday, Apple  acquired MotionVFX, a Polish software company founded in 2009 by Szymon Masiak. No financial terms were disclosed. Apple did not issue a statement. It rarely does for acquisitions.

The 70 employees in Warsaw are now Apple employees, and the plugin catalog remains available for now, which is the kind of detail that sounds reassuring until you remember that Pixelmator’s catalog was also available, right up until it wasn’t.

So what is MotionVFX, for anyone who has not spent time in a video editing suite.

If you have watched a YouTube video with clean cinematic color grading, a documentary with smooth lower-thirds, a short film with professional-grade transitions, there is a reasonable chance MotionVFX’s tools were somewhere in the process. The company makes plugins, templates, and visual effects for Final Cut Pro, Apple Motion, and DaVinci Resolve. Its mFilmLook plugin replicates the texture of actual film emulsion. Its mO2 plugin lets editors drop 3D models directly into a timeline. These are not novelty tools. They are the kind of infrastructure that makes a one-person production look like it had a post-production team.

Broadcast editors use them. Filmmakers use them. The YouTube channels with ten million subscribers use them. The wedding videographer in Pune who wants his work to look like it cost ten times what it did uses them. The gap between what MotionVFX makes possible and what it would take to build those effects from scratch is, for most working creators, not a gap they would cross on their own.

Apple is buying MotionVFX in part to attract more subscribers to its Creator Studio bundle, launched in January, which packages Final Cut Pro, Logic Pro, and Pixelmator Pro into a single subscription at $12.99 a month. The competitive target is obvious. Adobe Creative Cloud has been the industry default for long enough that creative professionals pay for it the way offices pay for Microsoft 365. Apple is building the answer to that, one acquisition at a time.

The pattern is worth noting because it tells you more than any individual deal does. Apple purchased Pixelmator and Photomator two years ago. Now MotionVFX. Each one fills a specific gap in the creative stack, and each one arrives inside a subscription bundle that is getting harder to dismiss as a hobbyist offering. Apple’s services segment now accounts for more than 26% of revenue, up from 8.5% in 2015. The hardware is still the hardware. But the business is increasingly the subscription.

The question that nobody in the coverage is quite asking directly is what happens to the third-party ecosystem that built itself around Final Cut Pro because Apple left room for it. MotionVFX thrived because Apple’s native tools had gaps. Those gaps are now being closed, one acquisition at a time, by Apple itself. The developers still making plugins for Final Cut Pro are looking at a company that has now demonstrated, twice in two years, that it will buy its way into capability rather than build it, and that the products it buys tend to get folded into bundles rather than sold independently.

That is not a criticism. It is a strategic reality with a straightforward implication: the ecosystem Apple allowed to grow around its creative tools is gradually becoming Apple’s ecosystem in a more literal sense.

Among MotionVFX’s most prominent tools is Design Studio, a panel that lets users browse and install effects directly inside Final Cut Pro.  That functionality, once it is native to Apple’s own software, does not need a third-party intermediary anymore. That is the quiet story inside the acquisition.

For the creators who have built workflows around MotionVFX tools, the short-term news is fine. The plugins still work. The catalog is still there. Apple has not announced changes.

The longer-term picture is that Apple is assembling, piece by piece, a creative suite that could genuinely challenge Adobe for a significant portion of the market. Not the Hollywood studios. Not the enterprise agencies. But the vast, growing middle of the creator economy, the YouTubers, the independent filmmakers, the small production companies, the people for whom $12.99 a month for tools that used to cost four times that is a very easy decision.

For that audience, this acquisition is a genuinely good development. For the independent developers still selling plugins in the ecosystem Apple is slowly absorbing, it is worth paying attention to the direction of travel.

Apple is building something. It is just doing it the way it usually does, quietly, one small announcement at a time, until you look up and the whole thing is already there.

Google chrome

Google Chrome Introduces Desktop-Style Bookmarks Bar on Android

Google Chrome Introduces Desktop-Style Bookmarks Bar on Android

Chrome’s version 146 for Android rolled out this week. It’s a bookmarks bar on your phone and table just like the one on your desktop.

It sits right below the address bar, shows favicons next to site names, supports folders, and has a small chevron on the right for overflow. If you have more bookmarks than your screen can show, that is where the rest of them live.

It is off by default. To turn it on, you go to Settings, then Appearance, then enable it manually. Google has made it available for tablets and foldable devices primarily, which is where it makes the most immediate sense. More screen real estate, more room to carry the bar without it feeling like an imposition.

The feature itself is not complicated. Most people know what a bookmarks bar is. The question worth asking is whether bringing it to a phone-sized screen, even optionally, is a good idea or just a familiar one.

Desktop habits do not always translate to mobile cleanly. The bookmarks bar works on a laptop because you have horizontal space and a cursor you can land precisely. On a phone, the bar adds a persistent row of small tap targets to an interface that is already asking you to do a lot with your thumbs. Folders in a bookmarks bar on mobile means a tap to open a dropdown in a space not originally designed for dropdowns. The chevron overflow means you will eventually be tapping into a full-screen interface anyway, which starts to feel like the same number of steps as just opening bookmarks the old way.

For tablet users, this is genuinely useful. The case is clean. You have the space, you are likely using Chrome the way you would use a desktop browser, and a persistent row of shortcuts saves real time.

For everyone else, the honest answer is that most people do not use bookmarks on mobile the way they do on desktop. Tabs, history, and the address bar’s autocomplete have quietly replaced that habit for a lot of users. The bookmarks bar on a phone may end up being one of those features that a specific kind of power user turns on, keeps on, and swears by, while most people never find it in Settings at all.

Which is fine. Optional is the right call here.

The more interesting UI question it raises is about direction. Chrome on Android has been steadily picking up desktop features, this being the latest. At some point the line between a mobile browser and a desktop browser becomes genuinely thin, and the question becomes whether that convergence serves how people actually use their phones or just how designers imagine they should.

A bookmarks bar is not that question. It is a small, toggleable feature that some people will love.

But it is pointing at something worth watching.